Saturday 11 July 2009

Letter to the German Consulate - Sydney


This is a letter that was sent from Ahlul-Qalam to the Deputy German Consular General in response to the brutal murder of Marwa el-Sherbini.



Michael Bartholmei
Deputy Consul General of the Federal Republic of Germany
13 Trelawney Street,
Woollahra, NSW 2025
Australia
Phone: 02 9327 9623
Fax: 02 9327 9649,

Dear Mr. Bartholmei

I am deeply saddened. She was pregnant for God's sake. But of course in s God-less secular society such statements of pity are likely to fall on ears as deafened as the hardened hearts people possess. Whether that be in Germany's communist past or their capitalist present! Is it a wonder then that the depths of lowness that barbarity has sunken to in secular western societies is reminiscent of the much reviled pits of hell for a Muslim.

When an event like this happens it is your system that is to be questioned. In typical capitalist fashion your finger-pointing, blame gaming attitude will only reveal your own mockery of your unorderly house. That is simply because the questions stand and they must be asked;

- how was it possible for an armed man to enter into your court room?
- how was it possible for a killer to walk across the room to the victim and stab her without any challenge from your security officers?
- how was it possible for a killer to continue stabbing a woman 18 times, without being challenged?
- why was it the husband to be the first to run to his wife's defence when armed security officers were present?
- how was it possible for the killer to then stab the man 3 times?
- how could it be that the security forces would mistake the husband as the killer after such a dramatic scene and shoot him?

This case is a landmark one not only in the sense that Germany paid not attention to what was occurring in its court room, for if people were attentive they would have not only stopped the repeated stabbing activity but prevented it by detecting the weapon on the killer in the first place. Or what was it perhaps acquiescence on Germany's part to rid the world of yet another Muslim?

This case is a landmark one to alert us Muslims that we are not safe in our lands nor in yours. For if this could happen in Germany, following Sarkozy's attack on us in France, then by all means it could happen to us in your Britain or America or here in Australia.

The proof of my rhetorical accusations will now be seen in Germany's pursuance of punishing the criminal, when the entire system is a dismal failure. Where would be the fairness in that when the system itself was left open to him to commit the crime? Even if some comfort were to be offered to your own selves, it begs yet the further question of whether you will apply capital punishment to the ultimate criminal? And then again of course no amount of punishment nor inquiry into your systems nor a commission to overhaul your security would return a child's lost mother to him!

How could you and the rest of Germany have a decent night's sleep knowing that? Perhaps your God-less-ness would afford you that comfort too.

Friday 10 July 2009

Death in a court creates a martyr

IT WAS while Marwa el-Sherbini was in the dock that the accused strode across a Dresden courtroom and plunged a knife into her 18 times. She had been recalling how the man had insulted her for wearing a hijab after she asked him to let her son sit on a swing last year.

Her three-year-old son, Mustafa, was forced to watch as his mother slumped to the courtroom floor.

Even her husband, Elvi Ali Okaz, could do nothing as his pregnant wife was killed by the 28-year-old Russian stock controller who was being sued for insult and abuse. As Mr Okaz ran to save her he, too, was brought down, shot by a police officer who mistook him for the attacker. He is now in intensive care in a Dresden hospital.


The horrific incident that took place a week ago has attracted little publicity in Europe, and in Germany has focused more on issues of court security than the racist motivation behind the attack. But 3000 kilometres away in her native Egypt, the 32-year-old pharmacist has been named the “headscarf martyr”.

Ms Sherbini’s funeral took place in her native Alexandria on Monday in the presence of thousands of mourners and leading government figures. There are plans to name a street after her.

Ms Sherbini, a former national handball champion, and Mr Okaz, a genetic engineer who was just about to submit his PhD, had reportedly lived in Germany since 2003. They were believed to be planning to return to Egypt at the end of the year.

Unemployed Alex W. from Perm in Russia was found guilty last November of insulting and abusing Ms Sherbini, screaming “terrorist” and “Islamist whore” at her, during the Dresden park encounter. He was fined 780 euros ($1370) but had appealed, which is why he and Ms Sherbini appeared face to face in court again.

Even though he had made his anti-Muslim sentiments clear, there was no heightened security and questions remain as to why he was allowed to bring a knife into the courtroom.

The government of Angela Merkel has been criticised for its sluggish response to the attack. The general secretaries of both the Central Council of Jews and the Central Council of Muslims, Stephan Kramer and Aiman Mazyek, spoke of the “inexplicably sparse” reactions from both media and politicians.

Because it occurred days after the French President Nicolas Sarkozy gave a speech denouncing the burqa, many Egyptians believe Sherbini’s death is part of a broader trend of European intolerance towards Muslims.

Media pundits such as Abdel Azeem Hamad, the editor of the newspaper al-Shorouk, have argued that if Ms Sherbini had been Jewish the incident would have received greater attention.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/death-in-a-court-creates-a-martyr-20090708-ddge.html

Thursday 9 July 2009

China's Crusade Against the Muslims of Xinjiang

In light of recent developments in Xinjiang where 150 people have been killed and 1434 imprisoned, this article looks at how Islam first entered China and the oppression committed by successive Chinese governments against the Muslims of the region. This article is an amalgamation of two articles first published in Khilafah Magazine in March 1997.

History of Muslims in China

وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِّلْعَالَمِينَ"
It was only as a mercy that We sent you [Prophet] to all people." [Al-Anbiyaa, 21:107]

The message of Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم is to prevail all over the world. In accordance with this vision the Sahaba (ra) who ruled after him صلى الله عليه وسلم sought to expand the frontiers of the Islamic State ever outwards. Seeking to complete his صلى الله عليه وسلم noble purpose by ensuring that one day it would encompass the entire world, it was Khaleefah ‘Uthman ibn Affan (ra) that initiated substantive contacts with China. With the Byzantine Romans defeated and the Persian Empire conquered, ‘Uthman ibn Affan, the third Khaleefah, dispatched a deputation to China in 29 AH (651AD). It was led by Sa'ad ibn Abi Waqqaas (ra), the maternal uncle of Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم. Its mission was to invite the Chinese emperor to embrace Islam.

China's First Masjid and Muslim Settlers

The deputation built a magnificent Masjid in Canton city. This Masjid is known to this day as the "Memorial Mosque". There are some reports that Sa'ad was eventually buried in China. Over the years Muslim trading activity through traders and merchant naval movements led many to settle in China. One of the first Muslim settlements in China was established in Cheng Aan Port during the era of the Tang dynasty.

It was from this time that the Muslims of China began to encounter the venom and hatred of the Chinese Kuffar. However with the Khilafah still in place, the spirit of Jihad was strong amongst the Muslims. So such oppression was not met without the most appropriate response- fighting fee sabeel-Allah. One of the first regular wars was waged at the Chinese border in 133AH. The Muslims were led by a great mujahid, Ziyad. They were far less in numbers but, with the help of Allah سبحانه وتعالى, the Muslims delivered a crushing defeat on the Chinese. After this conquest, the Muslims came to command respect, power and a complete control over the entire Central Asia. In 138 AH Khaleefah Mansur dispatched a unit of 4000 armed Muslim troops to add to this awe.

The Jewels of Mercy

These early victories opened the doors of China for the Muslims to spread and propagate the beauty and the truth of Islam. So the victories were consolidated, in accordance to the method of Islam. The Muslims settled in China and they married Chinese women. These early Muslim settlers then started establishing Mosques, schools and madrasas. In the cities, the Ulama were dominant. From the teaching in the madrasas many students gained immense knowledge. Students from as far as Russia and India would attend these classes, literally observing the saying, "Seek knowledge even if it is in China". In the 1790's, according to tradition, there was as many as 30,000 Islamic students. The city of Bukhara, which was then part of China, came to be known as the "Pillar of Islam". It is this city that was blessed with a noble son, Imam Bukhari, one of the foremost of the Muhaditheen (compilers of Ahadeeth).

Jihad in the Face of Adversity

The early Muslim settlers in China saw all sorts of troubles and oppression. The tyrant rule of the Manchu dynasty (1644-1911) was the hardest and most brutal era administered against the Muslims. During this period five wars were waged against the Muslims.

(1) The Lanchu war 1820-28
(2) The Che Kanio war 1830
(3) The Sinkiang war 1847
(4) The Yunan war 1857
(5) The Shansi war 1861

This era is marked by gross Manchu animosity to Islam and Muslims. Muslims were slaughtered and Mosques were razed to the ground. These Muslims were led by men, who did not just lie passively in the face of the oppression but declared Jihad against the oppressive regime of Manchu. One of the military commanders by the name of Yaqoob Beg (1820-77) liberated the whole of Turkestan and attempted to administer Islamic rules from 1867-77. The Khaleefah of the time recognised Beg's struggle as Islamic and rejoiced at his success. Beg eliminated crimes of violence during his rule.

The Russians and British officials lamented this new force for Islam and spoke of a new Turkic-Chinese Muslim power rising from Central Asia, comprising of the provinces of Yunan, Szechawan, Shensi and Kansu. One British official stated, "We really have before us grounds to summarise that this remote part of the world may at present be the scene of a great Muslim revival."

China's Crusade Against Islam

Since the Communist take-over of Muslim East Turkestan (what the Communists call XingXang meaning ‘New Frontier') in 1949, there has been an almost total news blackout in the region. It is like the Stalinist purges of the Soviet Union which accounted for some 20 million deaths, details are very difficult to ascertain. A recent visit to Beijing by one of our Khilafah Magazine correspondents in 1992, however, verifies the abject oppression and tyranny to which the Muslims have been subject. At that time there was an underlying tension amongst the East Turkestan dwellers of Beijing. There is an area of Beijing frequented by East Turkestan traders, mainly silk merchants, called Kanjacou. Their venom and hatred of the Chinese authorities was commonly expressed. When a Chinese would pass by the street they would sneer "Kafir, Kafir! Jihad, Jihad!" Upon further investigation the living nightmare of the East Turkestan Muslims was revealed. One man was on the run from the police for the ‘crime' of teaching the Qur'an to children. There were regular police round-ups of the Muslims in Beijing. This was what was happening in Beijing, it cannot surely compare with the despotism and persecution to which the Muslims have been subject in East Turkestan. This oppression has the sole objective of stripping the Muslims of their Islamic identity.

Soon after the Communist take-over in 1949, the Mao government set about dividing the Muslims into nationalities so they would identify with their ‘ethnic' origin and not their ‘Muslim' identity. According to population statistics of 1936, the then Kuomingtang Republic of China had an estimated 48,104,240 Muslims. After Mao's policies, the number was reported to have been reduced to ten million. No official explanation has ever been given for this apparent disappearance of around thirty-eight million Muslims. The mass extermination and destruction of the Muslims of China clearly makes the much publicised plight of a handful of Tibetan monks or the democrats of Tiananmen Square pale into insignificance, but the West would not shed tears for Muslims.

Aside from the physical annihilation, Muslims have been subject to a constant attack on their Islamic identity. The period of the so called Cultural Revolution (1966-76) showed openly the heathen attitudes and policies of the Communists. This can simply be summarised by two posters which appeared in Peking (later to be called Beijing) in 1966. These called for the abolition of Islamic practices.

Muslims were also banned from learning their written language in the Cultural Revolution. This language incorporates the Arabic script and appears influenced by Arabic, Turkish and Farsi. This change was critical as it distanced Muslims from the Arabic language, the language of the Qur'an and the Islamic State, a tactic used by many enemies of Islam, including Mustapha Kamal, the man who abolished the Khilafah. During this era many Mosques were closed down as the communists released their venom against Islam and the Muslims.

These days, as can be seen from the riots in East Turkestan, the resilience of the Muslims to the pagan communists has remained steadfast. The Communists realise the proud defiance of the Muslims cannot be broken, so they have adopted a policy of continued pressure on the Islamic way of life and establishing puppet ‘Islamic' organisations and institutes which are supposed to represent the Muslims. It is a policy of containment - not dissimilar to the regimes of countries like Jordan, Sudan and Kuwait allowing so called ‘Islamists' into their ranks in their attempts to placate the growing demand of the Ummah for the complete implementation of the Shari‘ah. Examples in China of this phenomena are the Islamic Theological Institute and the Central Chinese Islamic Association. Both receive government funds and patronage. Amongst a number of pro-government functions they arrange the Hajj (pilgrimage) - the number of Hajjis (pilgrims) is restricted and the selection is officially screened and controlled. Clearly, the Chinese authorities do not want news of their policy of oppression to Muslims to reach the Ummah.
Since the so called Cultural Revolution, waqf properties have been confiscated and mosques forcibly occupied. Officially sponsored campaigns have been launched against Islamic leaders who have been denounced as ‘reactionaries' and ‘anti-people'. The policy of ethnic (Muslim) cleansing has continued. Han (Kafir) Chinese have been moved to settle in East Turkestan in a further attempt to make the province have a Non-Muslim majority. Back in 1949 the Han population constituted a mere 2-3% of the total population, now they represent a reported 38%.

The Defiance Remains

Despite the Chinese government tyranny, the Muslims of East Turkestan have remained steadfastly defiant. Young men sport neckties bearing a crescent and a star, bearing semblance to the symbols of the Uthmaniyyah Khilafah, a ‘crime' that could land them in jail. In the Kajacou area of Beijing, one Muslim was asked about his children - he said he had six. This is despite Chinese law that says Muslims of East Turkestan are only allowed two! The Muslims have an adoration of all things Islamic. In Kanjacou they obtained a cassette of Qur'anic recitation one day, and by the next day it was copied and widely distributed. This attitude led the Muslims as far back as 1953 to come out en-masse in the streets and proclaim an independent Islamic province in north-west China. Obviously, this was vigorously suppressed by the Communists, but the vehemence of popular reaction was unmistakable. The affinity the Muslims have towards the Ummah and their wholesale rejection of the heathen communists shows the Chinese will never suppress the spirit of Islam in the Muslims of present day China. As one Chinese government official put it, "It's like hacking them with a knife. They'll never forget the wound."
Nor should we forget the wound and let it be known the future Khaleefah will have, Insha'Allah, an army of Mujahideen willing to fight for the cause of Islam right on China's doorstep.

Monday 6 July 2009

Sarkozy - The naked truth

POLITICAL opportunist Nicolas Sarkozy forgot three fundamental lessons when he decided to denounce the burka.

The first one is that men should stay well clear of becoming embroiled in expressing opinions on women’s clothes, unless of course you happen to be called Lacroix, Gaultier, Lagerfeld or Ghesquiere.

This was a lesson learned the hard way by former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw who was pilloried when he questioned the nikab after asking a female constituent to lift her veil so he could see her face.

Could you imagine him making the same request of any female members of the Saudi royal household during one of his galloping missions to the Middle East?
Foolishly Scotsmen Gordon Brown and John Reid, hailing from a country where men wear pleated skirts and paint their faces blue, then waded in with the grace of a couple of dancing bears.

Even the Bishop of Rochester - a man who wears a pointy hat and a purple dress - chipped in his dislike of the nikab, full face veil or burka.

Of course they were all despatched very quickly by Muslim women in Britain who proved themselves to be anything but oppressed, subjugated creatures. And just to show there'’s real solidarity across women of faith and no faith, quite a few western feminists expressed their disdain at Straw and co while standing shoulder to shoulder with their Muslim sisters.
The second lesson is try and be sincere if you are taking up a cause. Sarkozy feigned his utmost respect for women by saying he felt the burka represented the unacceptable symbol of women'’s enslavement - today I can unveil him to be a purveyor of weasel words.

If he really cared about the subjugation of women he would seriously tackle the appalling levels of domestic violence French women suffer at the hands of French men - two million are victims of bullying, violent partners ... a staggering 400 are murdered by their spouse.
So how many women in France actually wear the burka? The answer is a very tiny minority - so much so that when the BBC'’s Emma Jane Kirby went to interview a burka-wearing woman in Paris she couldn’t find a single one!

The former BBC’'s Europe correspondent went to the Muslim quarter in the capital but all she could find were lots of women of North African origin wearing hijabs. She was given blank expressions and shrugs of the shoulder when she asked if any of them knew women who wore burkas - and the local Islamic dress shops didn’t stock any.

So why would Sarkozy launch such an onslaught on the burka, describing Muslim women who wear it as ' “prisoners behind a grille, cut off from social life, deprived of their identity'?As pointed out by one Islamic observer: '“The irony is that many Muslim women would say the current headscarf ban in France has created exactly this situation for them”'.

Well the real reason had nothing to do with the burka and everything to do with Sarkozy putting pressure on the Liberal Left, throwing a few cheap shots at the expense of Muslim women while trying to pick up a few votes at their expense as well.

Sarkozy, like many male politicians, is pretty gutless so in a pathetic attempt to disguise his real motivations in wanting to pick up votes, he invents a proposed ban of the burka as a defence of women's rights. This, he knows will go down well with the French electorate who see veiled women as a threat to their liberal self esteem.

Using women to win votes is a common political ploy - I remember when Tony Blair and George W Bush claimed their invasion in Afghanistan was in defence of women’s rights and designed to liberate Afghan women.

Those two even used and pushed their own doting wives to stand in front of the world'’s media to justify their husband'’s invasion of the country - on a recent visit I can tell you there are few career women emerging from the rubble of Kabul.

So next time a politician tries to drive through any form of controversial measure or make a spectacular announcement, please don’t fall for the mealy-mouthed excuse that they'’re doing it for the liberation of women and/or ethnic minority groups.

Reading the weekend newspaper opinion pages and columnists, I was amazed at how many supposedly intelligent, feministas fell for the Sarkozy bull. But they did - hook, line and sinker exhibiting an astonishing shallowness in their writing.

I genuinely have a feeling Sarkozy is one of these weak-kneed, lily-livered men who trembles at the thought of empowered women. And I think the sight of a woman in a burka makes him=2 0feel inferior.

Could it be that because his wife - as beautiful as she is - has bared all for every man on the planet to ogle, that the very sight of a burka-clad female makes him feel insecure in his own relationship?

As any European schoolboy can testify from the pictures Blu-tacked to his ceiling, to the crumpled, sticky torn out, somewhat crusty pages of last year’'s GQ hidden under their bed, France'’s First Lady is the stuff of male fantasies.

I suppose there must be some men around who might get a kick out of the thought of pre-pubescent boys fumbling over pictures of their wife in the buff ... or even dirty old, syphilitic men playing with themselves, but I wonder if the pocket-sized French Leader (a mere 5ft 5ins tall) is secure and confident in his marriage to a much younger woman?Consider this, if a woman chooses to be veiled rather than show her face to a man, is she doing so to protect her husband’s feelings, in which case she could be seen as being compliant and servile, or - more importantly - is she doing so to protect her own face from the violation of a man's eyes?

Could it be that some of these women, when peering out of their burkas at the French leader, feel so special that they do=2 0not want the likes of him staring at all of their features?
And this, I believe, is what disturbs Sarkozy because if burka-clad women don’t want to be peered or leered at by men like him then this would be seen not as a show of subjugation but a sense of female superiority.

Could it be that because every bloke on the planet who wants to, can study in detail every curve and crevice of his naked young wife, that the very sight of a burka-clad female makes him feel uncomfortable in his own relationship?

After all Mrs Sarkozy can be viewed in all her naked glory by anyone who can access the internet or a copy of last year’s GQ.

And then someone paid $91,000 for a naked portrait at a Christie’s auction in New York.
On top of that it appears someone stole hundreds of “highly intimate” images of France’s First Lady and an ex-lover a couple of months ago.

A 0Fascinating stuff, but let’s not dwell too long on this subject, I'’ve yet to raise the third lesson Sarkozy needs to learn and that is: People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
A quick scratch beneath the thin veneer of public office reveals the French leader to be a sauteur.*

And the source of this information is non other than the long-suffering Cecilia Sarkozy, who had to put up with 18 years of being married to a man with behavioural problems including being mean, cold and a serial womaniser.

In the book Cecilia, published by Flammarion in January 2008, she said of her husband: "He has a ridiculous side. He is undignified. Nicolas doesn't come over like a president. He has a real behaviour problem ... He needs someone to point it out to him. I did it for 18 years and I can't do it any more. I am the last person who can do it."

These, and other, extracts incensed Sarkozy and his estranged wife'’s lawyers sought an injunction to prevent publication on the grounds that the book had invaded the former first lady's privacy – not that it was inaccurate. The former French first lady Cécilia Sarkozy, divorced in October 2007, is quoted as criticising her ex-husband's morals, his parenting skills and his fitness to be president.

That must have been extremely crushing and hurtful for France’s little emperor’. But no more hurtful than attacking and scapegoating harmless Muslim women. I wonder if he feels as though they are judging him from behind their veils?

Well we'’re all judging France'’s ‘Little Emperor’ now and the verdict isn’t a good one.

*Sauteur: A vulgar term for a serial womaniser

* Yvonne Ridley is a broadcast journalist and author who presents a weekly political show called The Agenda for Press TV. Her website is http://www.yvonneridley.org/